Recruit Vicha

Re: "Applause for PM in tacking RTP rift", (Opinion, March 23).

To make the findings and recommendations on resolving the feud between our top cop and his deputy credible, PM Srettha Thavisin should recruit ex-graft buster Khun Vicha Mahakun as chair of the commission probing allegations of corruption and their connections to political figures.

Khun Vicha is dedicated to restoring our faith in our justice system. He's been a National Anti-Corruption Commissioner, Supreme Court justice, and chair of the commission that ex-PM Prayut appointed to investigate why we've been exceedingly slow in bringing Red Bull heir Vorayuth Yoovidhaya to justice in his hit-and-run incident that killed a policeman.

Given Khun Vicha's background, Thais will accept the panel's findings and recommendations as being fair.

PM Srettha should show his sincerity in restoring our faith in our justice system by pledging to make the panel's report public within seven days of receiving it.

Burin Kantabutra

Evidence lacking

Re: "Raising questions", (PostBag, March 28) & "B30 fertility treatment to tackle low birth rate", (BP, March 24).

Is Ellis O'Brien serious? Where are the statistics to support this? Maybe that's the real reason no one has raised this because there are none.

My work involves LGBT advocacy and rights and I know of no such statistic.

The population of Thailand has been steadily decreasing by roughly 2% per annum. This is not only a Thai problem, birthrates are declining in many countries simply due to the fact of economics (look at Japan).

Does Ellis know how much daycare costs in the UK or the US these days, school fees and so on, let alone the basic cost of living increases?

I wish people would do research before making blind statements then we can have an intelligent and informed discourse.

Michael P

Letter misses mark

Another lengthy treatise from JC Wilcox on democracy; another piece of gobbledegook. Does this correspondent have the slightest idea of the turmoil that has marked Thai politics since 1932? Does he realise there have been 20 constitutions and a dozen or so coups?

In what sense can the constitution be the "paramount" law when it changes at the whim of whoever happens to take power at any particular time?

How on earth do you take people out of the law-making progress?

How can democracy not be the right to vote when that is the very definition of the word?

Quite frankly, Mr Wilcox's letter is the usual jumble of nonsense, and I'm astonished that PostBag sees fit to inflict it on us yet again.

Ray Ban

Point taken

Re: "Democratic society", (PostBag, March 28).

JC Wilcox is right that "Democracy is not the right to vote". Even in North Korea and Cambodia, people vote. Mr Wilcox could not be more impressively wrong with his notion that "Democracy is about governance by laws". Under that weird conceit, not only is North Korea a model democracy, but so too are China, Russia, every tin pot dictatorship and every brutish theocracy: they all insist on the strict rule of law as the foundation of their every suppression of human rights, of decency, of fairness, of liberty and, of course, their suppression of democracy.

If I might suggest a more useful understanding of it: democracy is any system of government where the people of a nation have an equal right to contribute opinions, ideas, likes, dislikes, beliefs, prejudices, moral values, tastes and the like to their society, whence is formed by them the government that makes the laws that all the people of that society are expected to follow. It is democracy and the people that make the law, not the law that makes democracy.

This understanding of democracy requires, as a non-negotiable minimal requirement, that there be strong legal protection for free speech. That is why Thailand's lese majeste law is not aligned with basic democratic principles. Even if such a law had solid majority support, it would nonetheless be contrary to democracy.

Mr Wilcox is to be commended for contributing to open discussion on the nature of democracy and the role of law in a just society. Thailand needs more such public debate. Nor should Mr Wilcox's views be suppressed by law merely because they are wrong and arguably dangerous.

Felix Qui

Thailand's rise

Re: "Building an economic backbone", (Business, Oct 30, 2023).

A Great Power is a sovereign state possessing significant economic, military and diplomatic capabilities, exerting considerable influence on regional and global affairs. Professor John Mearsheimer, a renowned expert on Great Power dynamics, emphasises that only a few nations with a critical mass of population and wealth can attain this status.

Since the fall of the Soviet Union, the US has been the world's only Great Power. Following Great Powers, Major Powers hold sway in world affairs through military and economic means, exemplified by countries like Germany, Japan and France. Below Major Powers are Regional Powers, a tier Thailand currently occupies. As a recognised regional power, Thailand wields an indirect global influence beyond the region through its soft power assets like Thai cuisine, Muay Thai and its status as a premier tourist destination. Nevertheless, in times of geopolitical confrontation among the Great Powers, these soft power elements will be of minimal significance. Thailand needs to up its game.

From post-WWII to today, the US has been the single Great Power that dictated the "world order". Today, the world is witnessing a shift from a unipolar to a multipolar landscape, where China's inexorable rise poses a challenge to the reigning Great Power, the United States. History has demonstrated that the ascent of a challenger is beyond the control of incumbent Great Powers. The rising power often charts diverse paths to the top that evade the incumbent's attempts at obstruction. This dynamic is evident in the ongoing US sanctions and China's ability to chart alternative pathways exemplified by advancements in industries such as space, solar panels, automobiles and manufacturing.

An essential consideration for Thailand is that historical transitions between Great Powers consistently involve significant conflict or outright war, a recurrent pattern throughout history. In light of these escalating global geopolitical tensions, Thailand must now endeavour to achieve a status beyond a regional power. In the not-too-distant future, when the inevitable conflicts occur between Great Powers in this region, Thailand will need a mechanism to defend itself, a neutral positioning and a way to involve the world's interests in our independence and well-being.

One unique aspect of Thailand's geography is the isthmus of Kra, a narrow strip of land that separates two vast oceans, the Pacific and the Indian. Constructing a canal to link these oceans would require building a canal of just around 120 kilometres. This canal would provide an alternative to the Malacca Strait route. This shorter travel route via the canal promises savings in both time and money while also offering protection from pirate attacks, vessel congestion and disruptions due to geopolitical tensions. This route would quickly become the preferred route for trade between Europe, the Middle East, and all nations in the South China Sea region, encompassing China, Japan, Korea, the Philippines and Taiwan. Moreover, the project's financial viability is well-established: as long as the canal offers cost savings compared to traversing the Malacca Strait, the investment in digging the canal can be recouped with profit through its operations. Studies indicate that the canal's operation would also stimulate the local economy, potentially boosting regional GDP growth by up to 10% annually.

This is, of course, the isthmus of Kra Canal project which has been languishing in parliament for decades. Endless debates have failed to result in any concrete action. However, the shifting global landscape has now added much weight to the necessity for the approval and funding of this project. What hasn't been factored into the decision-making equation in the past is the geopolitical importance and the potential elevation of Thailand's global stature and influence as the sole or principal owner of the Kra Canal. By assuming the role of gatekeeper to what will be one of the world's major shipping lanes, Thailand stands to expand its presence on the global stage significantly. Ensuring the canal's continued openness and international accessibility will become a shared objective among trading nations, motivating them to rally behind Thailand's continued independence. The Kra Canal project represents the singular opportunity to elevate Thailand's global standing and amplify its voice loudly enough to be heard by the UN General Assembly and Security Council.

In today's escalating geopolitical tensions, the Kra Canal Project stands as a vital cornerstone for securing Thailand's future safety. There is no better time to make the Kra Canal project one of Thailand's national priorities. Instead of endlessly debating the merits of the project, each of us should take action by grabbing a shovel, and head down south to start digging.

ML Saksiri Kridakorn

Big Joke to Lop Buri?

Re: "Police form new 'special' monkey unit", (BP, March 28).

May I suggest that, instead of languishing in some inactive post in Bangkok twiddling his thumbs, deputy police chief Pol Gen Surachate Hakparn (aka "Big Joke") should be seconded to the new "special" monkey unit in Lop Buri. I'm quite sure he might prove useful. Just a thought...

Richard Ferns
CONTACT: BANGKOK POST BUILDING136 Na Ranong Road, Klong Toey, Bangkok 10110Fax: +02 6164000email: postbag@bangkokpost.co.thAll letter writers must provide full name and address.All published correspondence is subject to editing at our discretion.
29 Mar 2024 29 Mar 2024
31 Mar 2024 31 Mar 2024

SUBMIT YOUR POSTBAG

All letter writers must provide a full name and address. All published correspondence is subject to editing and sharing at our discretion

SEND