Invest, not spend
Re: "BJT to revive co-payment scheme for daily buys", (BP, Sept 7). Prime Minister Anutin Chanvirakul should subsidise investment, not consumption. A key reason for Paetongtarn's downfall was her blind insistence on her B10K/person handout to subsidise consumption, forecasting a fiscal multiplier of 3 to 4.
Instead, her first two tranches flopped spectacularly, with the World Bank issuing a preliminary fiscal multiplier of just 0.4, or a meagre 7–10% of the hoped-for amount.
With an average farm household income of 240,000 baht a year (in 2019), 90% of farm households owing an average of 1.875 years worth of income, and the average farmer being 59 years old, farmers acted rationally and used much of their windfall gain of 10,000 baht a person not to consume but to reduce debt.
Paetongtarn's digital-wallet cash handout programme was another handout to stimulate consumption, not productivity.
But what we desperately need is to upskill, not consume. The World Bank found that 64.7% of Thais aged 15–65 struggled to understand and follow simple medical instructions.
How can we expect much from such a lack of expertise?
Subsidise that which will boost productivity, such as high-yielding seeds, farm machinery or training for a new trade.