Bet on trouble
Re: "Senate shoots down casino bill", (BP, Sept 24). I note that in your article, Senator Vichaya Suwannaprom cites Sydney, Australia, and its casino access policies as a potential model for Thailand. As an avid reader currently residing in Sydney, I would be remiss if I did not make the following observations about our two casinos.
While the Barangaroo "Crown" Casino is technically restricted, residents can gain access by enrolling in a loyalty programme that encourages gambling. New members are subject to a mandatory seven-day lockout before their cards become active, and membership is maintained through regular engagement. The casino features higher-stakes tables and no gaming ("pokies" or "slot") machines, which can amplify potential losses.
The Star Casino, by contrast, is open to anyone over 18. It features gaming machines and tables ranging from small to large bets. Operating 24 hours a day, it has earned a reputation as a venue rife with drunken, or even accusations of recreational drug use and financial issues by patrons under the influence. It is, frankly, a blight on an otherwise stellar international city.
Given these realities, the Thai Senate would benefit not only from consulting key stakeholders in Sydney about the social impact of these casinos but also from visiting both venues late on a Friday night to witness firsthand their effects on the community.
Finally, any economic benefit from casinos is minimal compared with the significant social costs: increased domestic and personal violence, public health problems, and widespread financial distress. A casino is a slippery slope for any society. Thailand should think twice before establishing one.