Liquor logic lost
Re: "Restaurants voice concern over new alcohol law", (Business, Oct 29).
I am now enured to this ongoing nonsense. If I want to buy a few beers "after hours", I visit our local corner store, which snorts at puffing bureaucrats. If I want something stronger, within the Thought Police's aegis, I plan accordingly before visiting our local supermarket.
The sales staff know me well enough after so long and no longer point frantically to purchase imposition bans and times, prominently displayed in the booze section. Now, two minutes after 11am, they seductively suggest that maybe I should supplement my bounty with other highly expensive strong waters.
But, alas, they remain unsuccessful, unless I am in a Mexican or Japanese frame of mind.
Wake up, Thailand, your dwindling, lucrative, and thirsty tourist base will continue to move to Vietnam or elsewhere due to this anachronistic law and other reasons, because in the past, you could not control the extended lunchtime activities of your own well-oiled civil service.
Moreover, you largely turned a blind eye to this law after it was enacted in the 1970s until a sterner, unelected administration took charge in the mid-2000s, which empowered it and the holier-than-thou PostBag temperance movement that I admit makes a strong point in terms of intemperate alcohol use and subsequent fatal consequences on the roads and elsewhere.