Naval innovation

Re: "China's updated 6th-generation fighter jets put US on notice for air supremacy", (World, Nov 3). China is not just overtaking the US in air supremacy; it is surpassing the US in the technology to launch a fighter jet from an aircraft carrier.

The US Navy was once proud to announce that USS Gerald R Ford, the supreme nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, could launch its fighter jets with the Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (Emals), outclassing the conventional steam catapult system used in older carriers (like the US Nimitz-class).

However, the technology behind the electromagnetic catapults on USS Gerald R Ford proved to be hard to master, causing issues for years that the US Navy was unable to mitigate.

In mid-September this year, the Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy demonstrated its ability to launch and recover aircraft from its first catapult-equipped aircraft carrier, the Fujian. Fighter jets carrying over 700kg of missiles and fuel are able to take off in a matter of five minutes, outperforming those of the US.

The Chinese Emals adopted a direct current power transmission system rather than the alternating current catapult system developed by the United States.

Perhaps the success of the PLA has led to President Donald Trump's rant about steam vs electric, and hydraulic vs magnetic, aircraft carrier catapults during his speech to troops aboard the USS George Washington in Japan, claiming the old steam catapult system is good enough.

On Oct 1, 1949, Mao Zedong declared in Tiananmen Square that "the Chinese people have now stood up".

On Nov 5, in a formal commissioning ceremony attended by Xi Jinping, aircraft carrier Fujian officially entered active service. On this day, the Chinese people have stood up both in the air and at sea.

Yingwai Suchaovanich

Silencing attempt

Re: "Vote on Epstein files looms", (World, Nov 19).

President Trump was questioned about the Epstein files and responded with "Quiet. Quiet, piggy." This is wrong in so many ways.

The first is the attempt to silence a journalist. Without a free and reliable news media, a democracy won't be able to operate safely.

There are far too many journalists who have been killed because of their work as reporters, although not even a single journalist should be attacked.

Words are another form of attack and shouldn't be used to attack an individual.

The second is the use of words to insult an individual. He has labelled so many people as being of "low IQ" even though they were lawyers and politicians.

The simplicity of his insults and the invention of his own words, who can forget "Covfefe", doesn't improve his image.

In my view, it is OK to criticise what reporters write, but not the reporters themselves.

Dennis Fitzgerald
19 Nov 2025 19 Nov 2025
21 Nov 2025 21 Nov 2025

SUBMIT YOUR POSTBAG

All letter writers must provide a full name and address. All published correspondence is subject to editing and sharing at our discretion

SEND