Derelict outpost

Re: Toxic threat sweeps all before it", (BP, Dec 1). Your recent report left me more than a little confused about a village I have known for 37 years. The description bore little resemblance to the village I visit maybe four times a week when I visit my local supermarket or withdraw money from the ATM. Those golden years of rafting took place before the highway was constructed over the mountain range.

There were also regular long-tailed boats, the quick way in those days to Chiang Rai. But once a decent highway, the 107-1089, was cut through the hills, Tha Ton was reachable by lunchtime, and the need for an overnight stay was removed.

Trekking trips dried up many years ago, and the cheaper hotels that relied on them are just about all gone.

For a while, large bus groups of Chinese passed through either going to or from Doi Mae Salong, but they disappeared after the Covid-19 outbreak. A new boat pier opposite the Saranya Hotel looked like efforts to revive tourism were underway, but the riverfront and part of the pier were destroyed by the huge flood 15 months ago and still haven't been repaired.

For the few tourists who do arrive, there are few good eating places, no bustling night market and one nightlife bar/entertainment venue. Much of the riverfront is derelict, and only the Saranya and the recently rebuilt restaurant opposite look modern, clean and reputable.

Far more worrying for us who live here is the effect of the toxins on the food coming from the river-edge fields, irrigated by water in blue pipes still visible coming from the Kok River. One obvious truth from your report is that local authorities appear to be doing nothing to halt that activity, to ensure our markets are not selling poisonous goods and offer us clear information on where the toxins stop.

Steve Merchant

Anti-BBC bias?

Re: "Always one-eyed", (PostBag, Dec 1) & "Eye on Hat Yai", (PostBag, Nov 28).

In response to Ian Dann and Ellis O'Brien's emotional and one-eyed comments on the BBC, I suggest it pays to read the BBC app in greater depth than they appear to have done.

Five days ago, the BBC covered the awful flooding in Hat Yai. Since then, it has published articles on the more deadly floods in Sri Lanka, Vietnam and Indonesia, and of course, the terrible fire in Hong Kong. If you don't like the BBC, as some appear not to, you can always check out other media sources that suit your preferences.

JezzaNong

Wet evidence

Re: "Parroting lies", (PostBag, Nov 28).

I must commend the Post's editorial staff for their wittiness in giving the headline of Mr Setter's latest letter about sea level rise as "Parroting lies".

Since he doesn't seem to understand how this is already affecting the planet, I would urge him to watch the award-winning documentary Inundation District, a tale of how Boston politicians ignored climate scientists and spent billions building the Boston Seaport, which now has more high-tide flooding than any other coastal city in the US.

The (wet) evidence is there for all to see.

However, I suspect he'll shy away from it and stay glued to woeful, homemade YouTube videos from climate change deniers instead.

Tarquin Chufflebottom

Smoggy exit

Re: "Thick smog reaches red levels in Bangkok and many provinces", (Online, Dec 2).

I thought our exalted Bangkok governor had determined that this would not happen this year, or at least be contained. Worse than 2024. Yet another reason for tourists to hop it.

Bill Renoise
02 Dec 2025 02 Dec 2025
04 Dec 2025 04 Dec 2025

SUBMIT YOUR POSTBAG

All letter writers must provide a full name and address. All published correspondence is subject to editing and sharing at our discretion

SEND