In defence of Anutin
Re: "Thailand hit by a confluence of crises", (Opinion, Dec 5).
Reading Thitinan Pongsudhirak's above column, one could be forgiven for assuming that before Anutin Charnvirakul became PM, there were no scam centres, no police corruption, nor any tropical storms.
Khun Thitinan cuts Anutin no slack. Apparently, the woes of the world can be laid at his doorstep. Indeed, I was surprised that Ajarn Thitinan didn't attempt to blame Mr Anutin for the debacle at the recent Miss Universe Competition.
No credit is given for Mr Anutin establishing good relations with both presidents Trump and Xi. His defence of Thai sovereignty without further bloodshed is dismissed as sabre-rattling. The Chinese rice order and efforts to boost rural incomes are not worthy of note. Nor is the successful rollout of the Kon La Khrueng scheme. His frequent visits to Hat Yai are also ignored. Unlike his predecessor, he didn't choose to hide in Bangkok but was active on the ground, taking responsibility.
Strangely, it is palpable that the columnist has not cast his sceptical eyes over the People's Party and Pheu Thai policies to deal with these crises.
No wonder, because they do not have any. One thing is clear: the People's Party make unreliable allies. One day they back Mr Anutin and the next they are flirting with Pheu Thai. I wish them well in forming a coalition after the election, should they fail to win a majority.
It's entirely a matter for the Thai people to decide who should form the next government. But to this observer, the choice is already clear. Chaos and conflict with the ideologues of the Pheu Thai: or a Pheu Thai government whose only concern would be securing the early release of Thaksin; or a pragmatic moderate centre ground government of reform with Mr Anutin at the helm.