Deputy Prime Minister Pakorn Nilprapunt has outlined plans to expedite reforms to align Thailand's legal framework with international standards, while stressing his independence from partisan politics and a strict policy of non-interference in judicial matters.
Mr Pakorn said on Thursday his decision to join the cabinet came after an approach by Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul, following former Council of State secretary-general Borwornsak Uwanno's decision to decline a ministerial post.
He acknowledged the move was difficult, noting his more than 30 years in the civil service. Mr Pakorn has served for six years as secretary-general of the Council of State, a position without a fixed term, and had four years remaining before retirement.
He acknowledged the move was difficult, noting his more than 30 years in the civil service. Mr Pakorn had served for six years as secretary‑general of the Council of State, a position without a fixed term, and had four years remaining before retirement.
Initially, he proposed continuing to assist the government in his existing role. However, the prime minister urged him to take on a more direct role, arguing that remaining within the Council of State would limit his ability to push forward unresolved legal reforms.
After consulting with his family, Mr Pakorn agreed, concluding that meaningful progress would require direct involvement at the policy level.
He underlined that he has not joined and does not intend to join any political party, describing himself as a political civil servant rather than a politician.
"I serve the country, not politics," he said.
Key priorities include strengthening Thailand's legal infrastructure to meet benchmarks set by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and accelerating the development of digital government, which he said would enhance international recognition of Thai laws.
Asked about politically sensitive issues, including alleged Senate election collusion and the Khao Kradong land dispute, Mr Pakorn said such matters fall under the judicial process and must remain free from government interference.
"If a matter is before the courts, we must wait for a ruling," he said.
