Battle for electric cars
Re: "FTI urges auto parts producers to diversify", (Business, June 18).
In my lifetime, I have owned many internal combustion engine (ICE) cars. However, for the past three years, as an early adopter of EVs in Thailand, I have been driving an electric vehicle.
With this EV experience, I will not buy an ICE-powered car again. EVs are less expensive to buy for the same drive quality, cheaper to operate, require little to no maintenance and allow me to contribute to a greener world.
ICE vehicles have dominated our lives and the world for the last century.
However, they have also created an environment that is toxic to our well-being and their continued usage is unsustainable. Fortunately, EVs have been invented, and Thai policymakers have had the foresight to nudge Thailand towards this transformative technology.
Despite this progress, not everyone is on board with EVs, especially major automobile manufacturers. Recently, Toyota, Mazda and Subaru announced they are forming a consortium to reinvent the ICE.
The difference this time is that the well-understood limitations of ICEs are being ignored. ICE limitation factors such as thermodynamic Carnot limitations, waster heat and friction losses, incomplete combustion and the draw from auxiliary systems have been extensively studied.
Despite a century of improvements by the best engineers in the world, the maximum efficiency a gasoline engine can achieve is around 30%.
In contrast, electric motors are 85–90% efficient for the same amount of energy. Furthermore, an ICE using fuel other than hydrogen -- which presents its own storage and refuelling problems for cars -- will still be toxic to our well-being.
This latest Toyota-led consortium announcement reminds me of the final scene in The Last Samurai, where brave samurais, armed with bows and arrows and the best katanas of their time, laid down their lives and charged against guns and cannons.
ML Saksiri Kridakorn